WINDLOADS.AI
Start a review
Patent-pending testing review technology

Review the test package before the mock‑up is built.

Averroes reviews testing mock-up drawings and submitted testing protocols before fabrication. Its free technical knowledge chat answers building-envelope testing questions without requiring an upload.

Patent-pending technology · Averroes by Windloads.ai

See how Averroes organizes a submitted system.

The workspace keeps submitted conditions, review priorities, and limits visible together.

Review focus
Mock-up drawings and submitted protocols
System focus
Impact-resistant building-envelope systems
Jurisdiction focus
Miami-Dade requirements
Approval evidence
Issued Florida drawings and evaluations
CURTAIN WALL ENTRANCEPROJECT
Illustrative curtain-wall entrance review
CURRENT FOCUSConfirm the entrance configuration before testing
  • Coordinate door, sidelite, and framing information
  • Confirm the submitted support conditions
  • Resolve connection questions before fabrication
Supporting engineering tools

Bring the approval and pressure basis into view.

03

Florida Product Approval Search

Search current Florida approval records, drawings, and evaluation reports in one focused workspace.

Search approvals
04

0 to wind loads in 60 seconds.

One address. Preliminary Florida wind pressures. Built for speed. Ready for your review. Need signed-and-sealed calculations? Take the next step when your project calls for it.

See how fast
Connected to issued Florida approvals

Bring relevant product drawings and evaluation reports into the review.

Compare the submitted package with issued approval evidence so scope limits and installation requirements stay visible.

Explore the approval evidence

Testing program review · Grouted railing calculator

Our core philosophy

Hard evidence over plausible answers.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”Carl Sagan
01

Traceable

The record, standard, calculation basis, or submitted document stays attached to the conclusion it supports.

02

Reviewable

The customer inputs, public standard, and resulting design values stay together for qualified review.

03

Skeptically examined

Plausible answers are not enough. Conflicting, missing, and unsupported information remains visible.

04

Clear about limits

Preliminary guidance, confidence, and professional-review boundaries are stated before a result is used.